Almost, my friends, almost.
Wife beating communist Baldwin at least claims to love the daughter that he called a pig over the phone. He even got some suckers to believe him.
I doubt Jolie will have as many people fooled after this Daily Mail piece in which she basically implies she doesn’t love her biological child as much as her adopted ones, and what’s more never really wanted the kid in the first place. It starts off just kind of weird:
Angelina Jolie revealed that her blonde-haired blue-eyed natural child Shiloh, 20 months, is the ‘outcast’ in her ethnically diverse family.
The actress – who has adopted three other children from around the world – said in a revealing interview, that her only biological child, fathered by actor Brad Pitt, is the odd one out because of her bright blonde hair.
No that attitude won’t cause issues in Shiloh, not at all. But wait, it gets worse:
Jolie also admitted she would have been happy not to have a biological child.
But changed her mind after seeing Brad with Zahara and Maddox after bringing her to the U.S. from Ethiopia.
She said: “I saw Brad with her and Maddox, and I realized how much he loved them – and how a biological child would not be in any way be a threat.”
Translation: “Don’t worry Shiloh, I decided you weren’t much of a “threat” to the children I really wanted so I had you to make your dad happy.”
And how is one child a threat to another anyway? Are the Pitt-Jolie brood destined for some sort of battle for ascendancy to the throne of Douchebagdom? If so it seems Angelina already has her favorite.
But it gets worse:
The actress said she felt a deep connection to her adopted children because of the pain they had endured in their young lives.
She added: “I felt so much more for Madd, Zahara and Pax because they were survivors.
“Shiloh seemed so privileged from the moment she was born.”
“But I’m conscious that I have to make sure I don’t ignore her needs, just because I think the others are more vulnerable.”
Yes, Jolie feels a closer connection to her adopted children because they’re “survivors” who endured much hardship (like being sold to a rich White lady like some sort of living handbag) just as Jolie herself, who experienced the hardship of growing up wealthy, privileged and with parents who allowed her to stunt her emotional development at around 13 is a “survivor.”
Jolie is projecting upon these children some immature psychodrama related to her youth and her feelings about her blood relations. She’s emotionally abandoning one child to lavish affected affection on the others and all the while destroying any chance any of them had to develop normal healthy views about relationships.
It is the glorified ignorance and political quackery of “Hollywood culture”, and the unconstrained narcissism that connects the two that makes it possible for a rational, intelligent woman to state as fact for history that it is impossible for her to love all her children equally.
One wonders what Shiloh at 32 will be saying about her feelings, or lack of them, for her mother especially after being confronted with her mothers apathy as part of the modern historical record.
Angelina Jolie may not be as big a douche bag as Alec Baldwin, but here she came damn close.
Angelina = fullblown narcissist, seeing her children as object/symbols/actors/accessories in her own psyche.
Why do personality disordered people usually have many children? To have many mirrors? To get away from the void? To project away the truth of being horrible parents and not capable of loving?
All of the above.
She Is Very beautiful, I like her very much, all the best Anjelina for ur future project!
Being beautiful does not exclude you from being a narcissist 🙂
Whoa! You have sure twisted her words into really hateful things. I just saw this article and it is beyond ignorant.
She was discussing how her adopted children had really difficult starts in life and that she “felt” for them as in empathized with their pain. Gee, try getting a better grasp on vocabulary. She did not say she loved some children more than others. There was no need to empathize with Shiloh.
The “outcast” remark is a joke.
There is a serious and real issue in some families with both adopted children and biological children. Some parents may and do favor the biological children. It is a difficult situation. Jolie, who had 2 adopted children she loved and wanted to protect from emotional pain needed to feel secure that her partner loved and bonded with her adopted children before she felt safe in having his biological child. These are normal feelings that any parent would have in their concern that they not bring pain into the lives of their present children. Yet you have turned these serious and well considered issues into some baseless and rather silly attack on Ms. Jolie.
There is also nothing wrong in deciding that you will mother only adopted children. Just as there is nothing wrong with coming to realize that circumstances change and so may your mothering decisions.
Freud you are not. Stop playing pop psychologist. You also fail at any meaningful understanding of parenthood.
“Jolie also admitted she would have been happy not to have a biological child.”
That appears in an article her biological child will one day read. Are you kidding? How would you feel if you read your mother would have been happy to not have you?
You’re a horrible person. Your children will no doubt grow up to hate you, which you may notice if you weren’t more concerned with defending celebrities than what they would think you claiming it’s normal to not love your children equally.