In an article at WND which detailed the pro-Islamist, anti-government protests in England after the recent attempted car bombings,a British radio host interviewed a firebrand cleric who had this to say about Islamic plans for the west:
Humphries’ interview with Abu Saif underscored the radically different vision many of Britain’s citizens have for the country’s future.
The Muslim leader said he does not believe in democracy and insists there is no such thing as freedom of religion, “because freedom is an absolute term.”
“Are we to say that Muslims can fully practice religion in America,” he asked in an attempt to explain. “Say, for instance, I was a Muslim in America. Could I call for the destruction of the American government and establishment of an Islamic state in America? No. So where is the freedom of religion? There is none.”
Humphries asked: “Do you call for that?”
“Of course,” he replied, “we want Islam to be a source of governance for all of mankind. And we also believe that one day America will be ruled by Islam.”
Abu Saif explained Islam, like Christianity, has a prophetic tradition.
“One of the prophecies of the message of Muhammad was the hour will never come, i.e., the last day – which you also believe in – will never come until a group of the Muslims … will rise and conquer the white house.”
The reference, many Muslims believe today, is to America’s symbol of executive power.
Read the entire article which includes additional speeches by Muslims who say basically the same thing. (h/t Sheepdog’s Blog)
This Islamist explains his warped view of freedom as evil and incompatible with Islam or morality, ignoring of course the fact that western style freedom allows him to sit around vomiting forth his savagery onto the Internet, which under a Islamic America wouldn’t exist:
The problem with freedom in the West is that it has no limits; by no limits, we mean no enforcement of morality. There’s a famous saying that “too much of anything is not good for you.†This comes true when on the subject of freedom. To expand on this concept, let’s take a simple example of a mother and her child. In this special relationship, the mother let’s the child do whatever he or she pleases provided that it is within the boundaries or set limits that the mother had given. Once the child crosses those boundaries, then the mother punishes the child. If her child were to get into a fight with a cousin, the mother would punish her child. This is part of the fitrah (human nature) all throughout the world that Allah has enabled within the human beings.
But what if we were to change that up a little? What if we said that the mother had given no limits or boundaries to the child and let the child do almost whatever it pleased? That would be insane! The child would grow up to become corrupt and make the world a more corrupt place. This is what America calls freedom. Islam calls it fasaad (corruption). America gives the excuse that “every man and woman has the freedom to choose between good and evil.†It is like they are playing as God himself! Instead of making it easier for the people to live a righteous life – like how Islam does for both the individual and state level – they make the temptations of the world appear more favorable with their culture of pornography, homosexuality, alcohol, and murder, and then slap on the label, “It is your freedom! So choose!†Naturally, the people follow their desires and make America what it is known for today: a hypocritical, despotically immoral nation led by crooks and baby killers that have horrific intentions to make the world follow their path because of its diversity in evil and deception.
In Islam, however, freedom is to be able to practice your Religion as much as possible, which includes establishing the Shari’ah and waging Jihad for the cause of Allah. Freedom is to be able to stand up to the tyrants and tell them, ““Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides Allah.†[Al-Mumtahinah, 4] Free from your wretched laws, methodologies, constitutions and values… free from your repugnant governments, courts, distinguishing characteristics and media… “We have rejected you, and there has become apparent between us and you, enmity and hatred forever, until you believe in Allah Alone.†[Al-Mumtahinah, 4]
When one is able to live a life that doesn’t imitate the disbelievers, then he is free. When one is free of peer pressure to do evil whether it is from schoolmates, colleagues, or family, then he is free. If one is free of the mindset and worldview of the disbelievers, then he is free. If one receives insults and persecution for his beliefs, then he is free. When one is able to live a life of righteousness more easily than a life of decadence, then he is free. When one is able to forbid and eradicate evil without fearing the fingers of the people and their tongues, then he is free. When one is able to stand up and enforce the correct way of thinking and life without fearing men, then he is free. And the highest of all these is when he is able to stand in the face of the tyrant governments and their ocean of soldiers whilst not fearing their overwhelming weaponry power since his faith is in his Lord alone and he knows how powerful his Lord is, then he is free.
When morality is taken over by evil and called freedom, then this is only a disaster to the nation as it would then have to preach to its children, “righteousness is bad, and evil is good.†This is so because evil sells. And if America stops selling, then there wouldn’t be an America.
I should insert here that after doing a few posts on the unsavory practices of YouTube, a post I wrote called YouTube, Snuff Films and Underage Girls gets several hits a day from Muslim countries by people who, according to my stats package, are looking up terms like “illegal little girls” or “young girl snuff” or some permutation of those terms.
You’ll notice that Muslims, as evidenced by their own words, do hate our freedoms. They hate that we don’t enforce morality on others. The Judeo-Christian ethic that our civilization still holds in high esteem, that man has free will and must choose how to live, is incompatible to the fascist, nihilistic hate cult of modern Islam.
Any country that wants to keep its precious freedoms must make it clear that they are willing to fight for them, even if it means fighting fellow citizens who are offended by that freedom. The time is coming soon when we Americans, and especially those on the left, will have to decide just what side we’re on. Do we stand up for freedom, or bow down to the whims of Islam under the guise of multicultural respect. Do we believe that Homosexuals have equal rights or will we cast them aside to appease radical Muslims? Do we want to live in America, or the caliphate.
Because we cannot do both.
We really need a candidate who can stick to the Constitution and fight for freedom and secure borders. WND also showed us that Ron Paul is not that man. He proposes backing down and trying to talk with Iran. He obviously does not read this or the other 910 blogs because if he did, he would see why we must not show what the enemy will see as weakness. He doesn’t see that they lie and manipulate us, and ultimately betray us at every step of the way. Sadly, he seems the best of the worst… I keep trying to get Chuck Norris to run, but I don’t think that’s going to happen this time around…
Chris: did you just call Ron Paul “the best of the worst?” Care to explain further why a bigoted 9/11 truther is better than the other candidates?
Ron Paul is incompatible with freedom.
Now as for Chuck Norris, I wouldn’t say no to a Fred Thompson/Chuck Norris ’08 ticket. I’m pretty sure they could end terrorism just by thinking about it at the same time.
As an official FredHead myself (as Jenn well knows) I’d say Fred! is the best candidate. But although I’m no Rudy fan in many respects, I think he’s a pretty good pick for fighting Islamofascism. He gets it, he’s willing to fight and because he’s a lib in Republican clothing I think he’d take care of a lot of these terror compounds Waco style.
I otherwise wouldn’t want to live in Rudy’s America, but I trust him on that.
I’m holding out for Secretary of Defense Norris myself.