The jihadist savage from Ignored Pieces of the Puzzle has this post up dealing with the old Christian advice to “love the sinner, hate the sin” which he believes is the worst form of degeneracy:

This is a refutation of those who say, “We should hate the sin, but not the sinner itself.” And this “sin” we refer to is Shirk. The obligation upon the Muslims is to hate not only Shirk, but the disbelievers themselves who commit it. Many Muslims shy away from this because they know that if they are to do it, then they will face hardships in life, especially from the disbelievers. This is why it is better for a Muslim to live amongst the Muslims than to live amongst the disbelievers. However the strong Muslims do not waiver and the disbeliever – when they see the strong Muslim – will know that the Muslim only cares about their salvation.

He goes on to site Islamic sources which prove his point, much to the chagrin of all you multiculturalists out there. Shirk by the way, encompasses everything from being a different religion than Muslims to not having a religion at all. Here’s a good list of what is and isn’t considered shirk. Where do you fit in?
What’s odd is that the author seems to imply Muslims should be separate from non-Muslims, yet doesn’t live in a Muslim land. It’s like he thinks there’s a chance that Muslims will control western countries in his lifetime or something…