Apparently the judge thinks the right of child rapists to enjoy the holiday with their families supersedes the right of children to not be viciously raped. Surprise! The ACLU is involved. From declining leftist rag The New York Times:
A federal judge in Missouri on Monday temporarily blocked parts of a new state law that requires sexual offenders to remain in their homes on Halloween evening and to avoid any contact with children related to the holiday.
The judge, Carol E. Jackson, of United States District Court in St. Louis, said the law was unclear, questioning language that prohibits “all Halloween-related contact with children†and allows sexual offenders to leave their homes from 5 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. only if they have “just cause.â€
Two issues raised by the case were whether sexual offenders could celebrate the holiday with their own children or grandchildren, for example by hanging decorations or carving pumpkins, and on what grounds they could leave home during the curfew.
The attorney general’s office said it would appeal the order, but declined to comment further.
Chief Judge Jackson allowed two provisions in the law to stand, requiring sexual offenders to post a sign stating “no candy or treats at this residence†and to turn off any porch lights.
Illinois and Louisiana have also passed state laws restricting sexual offenders’ activities on Halloween, and some other states have similar agency regulations or municipal ordinances.
Missouri’s law was enacted as part of broader legislation cracking down on sexual offenders.
“We’re counting it as a victory that kids going trick-or-treating will be a degree safer,†said State Senator John Loudon, a Republican who sponsored the legislation, speaking of Monday’s ruling. “And then we’ll have to go back to the drawing board depending on court action.â€
The ruling came after four anonymous convicted sexual offenders sued this month, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri. They say the law is not only vague but also unfair and unconstitutional, an argument their lawyer vowed to keep pushing. “Once people have completed their sentences,†said the lawyer, Anthony E. Rothert, “you can’t go back and punish them for the same crime.â€
Right. And you can’t make common sense laws that are designed to keep people who admit they’re unreformable from victimizing more children. Child rapists do not have a right to give candy to children. Being a part of a community celebrating holidays is a privilege, one that you should lose when you rape a child.
Rob Taylor,
This is sick. Apparently the ACLU cares more about the rights of child rapists, than the rights of innocent children, who this ruling could put in mortal danger.
Exactly Damien, and what the ACLU forgets is that no one is having their Constitutional rights endangered. The Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to not be ostracized. It’s disgusting.
I also believe that a few forms of Jewish law should be implemented here, child predators would not be able to misuse the system to get an easier sentence, rather, they’d be locked up in chains and carried off to jail like they should.
It just bothers me that we have such poor judges whom give easier sentences, almost doing the ACLU’s work for them.