Hundreds will die in NYC and the vicinity from heat stroke according to these surly unbiased researchers. See if you can find the faulty logic:

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – The number of heat-related deaths in and around New York City will nearly double by 2050 – and could rise as high as 95 percent — due to global warming if no efforts are made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, a new study shows.

“All kinds of households in the region might want to think about what global warming and greenhouse gas emissions might mean for their quality of life in the not-too-distant future,” Dr. Kim Knowlton of Columbia University in New York City, the study’s lead author, told Reuters Health.

By taking steps now to cut emissions, New Yorkers could prevent 300 of these expected deaths annually, Knowlton says. “We can save lives by taking progressive action now to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. That’s the good news.”

Knowlton and her colleagues used a computer model to estimate temperature increases in New York City and its environs by 2050 based on two scenarios, one representing rapid population growth and lack of “aggressive” greenhouse regulation, the other based on slower growth and “increased concerns about environmental sustainability.”

By 2050, heat-related deaths would increase by 95 percent a year based on the worst-case, high-emissions scenario, a figure reduced to 68 percent when the researchers accounted for acclimatization to the heat with increased air conditioning, heat alerts and other adaptations. Under the lower emissions projection, deaths would increase by 71 percent, or 47 percent with acclimatization.

Knowlton and her colleagues found a dramatic variation in expected mortality increases across the region, ranging from 38 percent to 208 percent. The smallest increases would be seen in the more urban parts of the region, such as within the city itself and in the New Jersey suburbs to the west, which are already relatively warm and will experience smaller temperature increases.

But deaths could skyrocket in the suburban and rural New York and Connecticut counties north of the city, which are currently relatively cool.

“The urban areas, the suburbs, and the countryside are all going to be affected by these hotter temperatures,” Knowlton said. No matter where they live, she added, poor people will likely have a tougher time coping with rising temperatures, given that many may not have air conditioning, or may be reluctant to use it due to electrical costs.

According to Knowlton, the best and fairest approach to reducing excess heat deaths due to global warming will be to introduce strong regulation of greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible. “That kind of regulation is going to afford us the strongest prevention in an equitable way.”

SOURCE: American Journal of Public Health, September 2007.

In essence, the author claims that a rise in temperatures by some unnamed degree will cause wide spread death among Americans in NYC and New England who will drop like flies. You know, because if you’re from those areas you can’t possibly live through a heat wave, which has never happened in that area. The Northeasterners are a delicate people, apparently.
Unless temperatures rise to about 130, I’m thinking you’ll see more skimpy clothes and less dead bodies. But a report like that wouldn’t sell the authors global warming hokum, or subscriptions to the American Journal of Public Health.

h/t Drudge