Surprise! “Palestinians” are Inbred Degenerates

Not that the fact that they’ve been desecrating Christian graves, kidnapping and raping Christian children and using their own children as human shields left much room for doubt about how backward the so-called “Palestinian” people are. But for those of you still concerned with the “plight” of people who manage to remain impoverished despite billions of dollars in aid per year (but always seem to have money to buy rockets to lob at Israeli schools) here’s a little fact that you won’t hear at the next Free Palestine rally: the Palestinian penchant for inbreeding has led to unusual levels of a genetic defect where male children are born with what looks like female genitalia.

Ever the pro-“Palestine” propagandists CNN begins the story with an attempt to garner sympathy for these cousin bedding cretin:

Gaza City (CNN) — Two Palestinian teenagers stroll amid the mounds of rubble left by last year’s Israeli military offensive, listening to the tinny beat of a Turkish pop song playing on a cell phone.

Nadir Mohammed Saleh and Ahmed Fayiz Abed Rabo are cousins and next-door neighbors. With their gelled hair, buttoned-down shirts and jeans, they look much like any other 16-year-old Palestinian boy. But looks, Ahmed says, can be deceiving.

“Only my appearance, my haircut and clothing, makes me look like a boy,” Ahmed says, gesturing with his hands across his face. “Inside, I am like a female. I am a girl.”

Until last summer, both Nadir and Ahmed were — for all intents and purposes — girls. They wore female headscarves, attended girls’ school and even answered to the female first names Navin and Ola.

Both Nadir and Ahmed were born with a rare birth defect called male pseudohermaphrodism.

Oh, how awful for these two youths who could just as well have stepped off the set of a prime time CW drama. How cruel is fate that these cousins and neighbors would both suffer from this rare disorder?

And by “fate” I mean the long standing tradition of inbreeding by this amoral clan of scum:

There are an unusually high number of male pseudohermaphrodite births in the Gaza neighborhood of Jabalya, where Nadir and Ahmed live.

Dr. Jehad Abudaia, a Canadian-Palestinian pediatrician and urologist practicing in Gaza, says he has diagnosed nearly 80 cases like Nadir’s and Ahmed’s in the last seven years.

“It is astonishing that we have [so] many cases with this defect, which is very rare all over the world,” Abudaia says. He attributes the high frequency of this birth defect to “consanguinity,” or in-breeding.

“If you want to go to the root of the problem, this problem runs in families in the genes.” Abudaia says. “They want to get married to cousins… they don’t go to another family. This is a problem.”

So in essence, even though the parents of the two boys above knew that their branchless family tree was passing this birth defect to their offspring they have flat out refused to break with the time honored Palestinian Muslim tradition of being given a female cousin to bed. Nadir’s brother and cousin, both of whom are significantly older, suffered the same condition yet both sets of parents continued to breed defective children rather than divorce and marry someone else. That, my friends, is the very definition of degeneracy.

CNN  has found a way to blame this on those pesky Jews:

In Western, more developed countries, doctors typically identify and then operate to correct disorders of sex differentiation at birth. But in war-torn Gaza, which has a lower standard of medical care, the birth defect can go undetected for years.

Yes, yes. War-torn Gaza where medicine is sub-standard but, according to CNN’s own reporting, almost all Palestinian teens are able to purchase hair gel and Western style clothing.

And of course CNN is happy to give this cult of unnatural wantonness passing itself off as a family what they want the most: a platform to demand that the West fund their depravity rather than holding themselves responsible for their own disgusting actions:

Though Nadir and Ahmed clearly have the love and support of their family, they say that is not enough. They are appealing to the international community to help them get the expensive and complicated sex-change operations they say they need to live normal lives.

“It’s the only obstacle and the source of all the problems,” Nadir says.

Until the sex-change operation is completed, Palestinian officials won’t change the gender on their identity cards to “male,” thus restricting their access to higher education.

In addition, Nadir and Ahmed complain of health problems like kidney infections due to complications resulting from the disfigurement of their genitalia.

“This is 100 percent a humanitarian issue,” says Nadir’s father, Mohammed. “There are four conditions in the same [extended] family. If we propose conducting the same operation on all four of them, the cost would be $30,000. We don’t have $30,000 and there is no advanced medicine in Gaza.”

Until then, these troubled Palestinians say their genders and their identities will remain in conflict, much like the land around them.

Yeah. It’s incumbent on we humanitarians to pay for the sex change operations necessary for children born to people who know that marrying their cousins causes birth defects but simply won’t stop. Makes perfect sense … in Palestine.

h/t Jammie Wearing Fool

Child Rapist Out on Bail Rapes Child in Massachusetts

Who could have seen that coming? Not the judges presiding over the case against Joseph H. Gardner. Prosecutors wanted Gardner’s bail to be set at $200,000 but Plymouth District Court Judge Thomas F. Brownell decided to set bail at a measly $10,000. Gardner’s bail was apparently not even revoked when he got caught driving drunk.

From Boston.com:

PLYMOUTH – A man arraigned yesterday on charges that he sexually assaulted a 3-year-old girl in Kingston on Friday had been charged this summer with raping another child but was free on bail.

Joseph H. Gardner, 26, of Kingston, pleaded not guilty yesterday in Plymouth District Court to a charge that he raped the daughter of a woman he was dating.

In the earlier alleged rape, the self-described construction worker was freed on $10,000 cash bail – far less than Plymouth prosecutors sought – on Sept. 15. He had been charged with breaking into the Kingston house of a distant relative and raping a 6-year-old girl.

“I always wonder why we let people out who are charged with such crimes,’’ Kingston Police Chief Joseph Rebello said angrily to reporters outside the courtroom. “Obviously, someone who has this type of background is no one that can be rehabilitated, and letting him loose in society only means we are going to have further victims.’’

The mother of the first alleged victim attended the arraignment and also assailed the decision to release Gardner.

“I don’t understand why he is still out,’’ she said, referring to the bail granted after the first arrest. “I think the courts should make sure he goes away and is not allowed to be around kids.’’

I don’t understand why he was out either. Judges in Massachusetts are supposed to take into account the dangerousness of the indivdual in bail hearings, and Gardner is clearly dangerous. But this process fell apart as usual when Liberal judges promoted hug-a-thug justice over public safety:

Plymouth District Attorney Timothy J. Cruz said Gardner faced “heinous allegations’’ in the first arrest and that prosecutors were disappointed that Plymouth District Court Judge Thomas F. Brownell set bail at $10,000 instead of the $200,000 they originally sought.

After Gardner’s indictment, the first rape case was transferred to Superior Court, where prosecutors again requested high bail – $150,000. But Judge Joseph M. Walker III kept bail at $10,000, and Gardner remained free.

Depending on the circumstances, Cruz said, judges typically impose a range of bail amounts in sexual assault cases. In some instances, he said, judges have released rape suspects on their own recognizance.

Judges are typically barred from speaking about pending cases.

Jack M. Atwood, a Plymouth lawyer whom McColloch works for and who represented Gardner on the first rape charges, did not return phone calls.

John G. Swomley, a Boston defense lawyer who has represented many individuals accused of sex offenses, said the $10,000 bail struck him as low.

“If the allegations are credible and there doesn’t appear to be something that wouldn’t be suggestive of fabrication, it would normally be a much higher bail,’’ said Swomley, who is not involved in Gardner’s cases.

Still, he said, the judges might have considered that Gardner had never been accused of a sex offense before August, according to public records.

Oh. So it was his first time raping a child. That explains everything. It’s not like the man traumatized a six-year-old in front of another child who testified about the assault:

In the first case, Gardner allegedly broke into a Kingston home through a bathroom window, according to the mother of the alleged victim, whose name the Globe is withholding because it would indirectly identify her daughter, the victim of a sexual assault. The Globe does not identify sexual assault victims.

Investigators gathered fingerprints and other forensic evidence that tied Gardner to the crime, she said.

According to a Kingston police report filed in court, the first alleged victim was staying at a woman relative’s house with another female relative, age 10, on Aug. 22. Between 4 and 6 a.m., the woman heard the 6-year-old crying and the 10-year-old girl yelling but dismissed it as a routine disturbance.

But around 6 a.m., the woman got up and was told by the 6-year-old that “a man was in her room . . . and was hurting her,’’ said the police report. A container of baby powder was on the floor and the powder was on the bed.

The woman discovered Gardner – to whom she was related by a former spouse – just steps away from the girls’ bedroom. Gardner said he was there to pick up garbage and take it to the dump, but the woman told police Gardner did not come through the front door and was not supposed to be in her home.

Gardner, who had baby powder on him, was ordered to leave but returned later with his father, David Gardner, according to the police report. Joseph Gardner “was very upset’’ and tearfully denied harming the 6-year-old girl, according to the report.

Yeah. Sounds like he deserved a higher bail. The victim was claimed to have “recanted” by a nurse but in reality the kid just wanted to get out of the hospital and the testimony of the ten-year-old and the forensics pretty much nailed Gardner. The ten-year-old is said to have given a “graphic” account of the crime.

And of course he has an excuse for the second assault. He was dating some tramp who tried to shake him down. Mother of the year slept over Gardner’s home, where the Massachusetts authorities have allowed him to keep custody of his four-year-old, sans kids the night before the assault then showed up the next day with her kids. I’m betting it was a set up, but Gardner isn’t innocent.

The events leading up to the second alleged rape began when Gardner started dating a woman with whom he had gone to high school, prosecutors said. The woman brought her two children, a 3-year-old girl and an 8-year-old boy, to spend the night at Gardner’s home on Friday, prosecutors said.

Gardner lives on Summer Street with his 4-year-old son. The woman had slept there without her children the night before, court records show.

The woman told investigators that she heard her 3-year-old crying in the middle of the night but dismissed it because the girl often got upset while sleeping.

The next morning the woman noticed that her daughter was no longer wearing a pull-up diaper and she asked her about it. The girl then allegedly told her mother that Gardner sexually assaulted her and told the girl he would kill her father if she told anyone, according to police. The woman took her daughter to Jordan Hospital, which notified police.

When police arrested Gardner at home on Sunday morning, he said the woman’s allegations were untrue. “She accused me of this yesterday and wanted money so I gave it to her,’’ Gardner told police, according to court records. “She must have heard about my other case.’’

Disgusting. A man bails out of jail for child rape and she shows up with new victims. Someone needs to help the children of Massachusetts because it seems like no adult there is willing to keep them safe.

WCVB has more and a video report.

h/t Dreamin’ Demon

Why Do Pedophiles Rally Around GLSEN?

So much for promoting safety for gay youth. It turns out that GLSEN’s reading list has some unexpected supporters, and by unexpected I mean just what I and others have predicted.

As I mentioned in my earlier post, my relationship with “anti” blogs like Absolute Zero United and groups like Pagans Against Child Abuse has made me privy to a little known world that many readers are blissfully unaware of – the online pro-pedophile movement.  There are a series of forums populated by both anonymous pedophiles and registered sex offenders that promote the idea that adults should be able to molest children and collect child porn. It is, to them, the fascism of people like me that “oppresses” pedophiles who they claim are a sexual minority like homosexuals.

One of the most repellent of these sites is a forum called Annabelleigh.net which is often referred to as “girl chat” because it is a forum dedicated to men who want to have sex with little girls. There is a brother site for it known as “boy chat” that is known to have been the online stomping grounds for several pedophiles that were later arrested. Of interest to any person who has fallen for their self-pitying claptrap about pedophiles being born with an unpopular orientation is that both sites share many members, including some of the most vile and dangerous child predators you could imagine. At one time the webmaster of  “boy chat” was fugitive Jon Schillaci whose activities there, under the name Dylan Thomas, led to his arrest by authorities.

GLSEN’s portrayal of the sexual exploitation of children by adults as at worst benign but in many cases an integral part of the coming of age of gay men has, as you can imagine, garnered much empathy from these online degenerates. I was sent a link to an older conversation on Annabelleigh.net in which several pedophiles discuss their support for GLSEN:

Girl Chat Loves GLSEN

As readers can see this thread is from two months ago, when the “girl chat” perverts were passing around a GLSEN school survey which put forward the idea that gay youth were victimized and needed help and support. The Annabelleigh.net community were eager to drum up support including sending it’s online army of rapists directly to GLSEN to donate:

Girl Chat Sends Support to GLSEN

I would suspect that no gay youth needs the kind of help and support people known to rape children would give. The pedophile who was passing around this study was Russell Thomas Kinkade who is a “boy lover” as well as a “girl chat” member. The stereotypical dirty old man, Kinkade tries hard to present his depravity as a sexual orientation but his writings, and his criminal record, clearly show that his interest is not so much a homosexual attraction to young males as a desire to indulge in perversions with any available child. He has gone on record as saying he finds infants sexually attractive.

Pedophilia is not a sexual orientation and men who wish to have sex with male children are not homosexuals. GLSEN presents adults who prey on children as “gay” and part of the gay experience. This is dangerous.

GLSEN has been defended by many groups, most notably Media Matters, who claim that anyone’s concern with this group’s vision of child sexuality is merely homophobia or prudishness. But GLSEN is not representing homosexuality any more than Annabelleigh.net is representative of heterosexuality. One need not be a prude to find GLSEN’s programs disturbing (as the comments on this Media Matters posts prove) but you have to be willfully blind or tremendously naive to not see the danger in GLSEN’s hyper-sexualized promotions of unsafe sex and child exploitation by supposedly gay adults.

And I say “supposedly gay” because the truth is that gay men are attracted to men, not children. The idea that children as young as 12 or 13 are attractive to the average homosexual is like saying heterosexuals are attracted to little girls. No education program would dare claim that adult men having sexual encounters with 13-year-old girls who were cruising bathrooms was acceptable or empowering, but GLSEN’s reading list promotes just that idea for young gay males. Why?

Who benefits from children being told that part of being gay is having unprotected sex with random men? I put forward that you only need to look at what pedophiles are saying about GLSEN to know who are the real beneficiaries of their “degenerate’s blueprint” of teen sexuality.

Like De Sade’s 120 Days of Sodom, GLSEN’s reading list is defended by those who intellectualize the material but don’t truly understand it. It is Russell Kinkade and his ilk who truly understand the message GLSEN is giving to children and thus support the organization and the educational program GLSEN has developed. Media Matters and the other defenders of GLSEN are happily unaware of the danger their perfidy puts children in, or at least that is what we hope.

So I ask those who support GLSEN one simple question: Why do pedophiles support GLSEN? I think the answer is obvious.

Gay Youth Deserve Better Than GLSEN and “Youth Liberation”

For the past few years I have become more involved with the online child safety advocate movement, or the “antis” as we are sometimes called in reference to our anti-pedophile stance. Ironically, it was because Red Alerts started as an anti-Communist/Leftist/Green blog that I was exposed to both crime blogging in general (due to several criminal incidents by radical leftists) and blogging about the pro-child rape movement in particular after doing some research into the Green/Rainbow Party’s “creepy Uncle” platform and the nonchalance of the World Can’t Wait organization in publicly calling for kids to cut school and meet them (strange adults) without telling their parents.

The link from American Marxist organizations to pro-rape activists like the ones profiled on Wikisposure and Absolute Zero United is the so called “youth liberation” movement which is merely a front group for a collection of adults with sexual interest in children. The originators of the “youth liberation” idea were the pedophiles of NAMBLA who maintain to this day that their mission is the liberation of children from oppression:

NAMBLA calls for the empowerment of youth in all areas, not just the sexual. We support greater economic, political and social opportunities for young people and denounce the rampant ageism that segregates and isolates them in fear and mistrust. We believe sexual feelings are a positive life force. We support the rights of youth as well as adults to choose the partners with whom they wish to share and enjoy their bodies.

I’m sure. The NAMBLA  “Youth Liberation” movement was quick to infiltrate both the gay rights movement and various Marxist movements in what has been an extremely successful campaign to mainstream “Youth Liberation,” at least among the activist left. David Thorstad, a founding member of NAMBLA, was a key player in this charade for many years until gays saw him for the pervert he was and disavowed him. His 1998 speech to Semana Cultural Lesbica-Gay entitled Pedastery and Homosexuality puts forward the idea that gays who disapprove of child sexual exploitation are “sellouts” to a capitalist, heteronormative society. In it, he also admits to molesting a teen.

Fellow NAMBLA founder Dan Tsang wrote a book entitled The Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power and Consent which is a collection of articles that promote the predation of children by “gay” men as, in Tsang’s own words on this review of his own book, a way to deal with

…the need to educate and empower of young boys and provide them with a voice and choices in the matter, the social structures that have created and maintain an unbalanced power relationship between youth and adults, overly harsh penalties for adult males who have been convicted of engaging in intergenerational sexual activity, and the conflict within lesbian and gay organizations over the discussion and practice of intergenerational sexual activity.

Tsang remains a respected progressive activist and academic.

Obama’s safe schools czar Kevin Jennings published his three books with the same publishing house that Tsang used to publish his rapeinomicon in an eyebrow raising twist of fate, since the current proponent of “Youth Liberation” is the organization he founded, GLSEN. The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network is supposed to “ensure safe schools” for gay youth by providing educational resources, but in reality they have long been known for providing raunchy sex party style presentations to children in an effort to support tolerance … for unhealthy paraphilias like fisting which can lead to serious injury.

Now GLSEN has been the subject of much controversy due to Gateway Pundit’s recent exposure of their reading list’s inclusion of pro-pedophilia material. The reading list includes books which depict all manner of depravity including the story of a child being raped then seeking out abusive and degrading encounters with adults in bathrooms ending with the supposed narrator’s reminiscence that the encounters, many of which were violent “near rapes,” felt “too damn good” for him to not to enjoy.

That this is pedophile fantasy, not the truthful retelling of a gay man’s formative years, is clear. That young boys like being raped and abused because males love sex is an excuse that I have seen literally hundreds of times from online pedophiles who claim that their victims wanted to be abused. Many use the language of “Youth Liberation” to cloud their true intentions. They become not predators but mentors to gay youth who need to guided by adults into mature sexuality, while the rest of us are oppressing youth by keeping them from sexually experimenting with lecherous and often unstable older men.

As Jenn Q. Public says, GLSEN’s book list is little more than an instruction manual for a lifetime of victimization and unhappiness:

After reading through dozens of passages, I’m left with the impression that exploitation, abuse, promiscuity, and risk are being promoted as normal, acceptable, and even expected experiences for gay youth.  Too many of these vignettes read like validations of the stereotypical hypersexual gay lifestyle.  Instead of reading about the challenges of coming out, gay teens (and their heterosexual peers) are being handed a degenerate’s blueprint for how to live a “gay life,” starting with being initiated by a pedophile and working up to unhealthy hate sex and anonymous restroom encounters.

I realize many gay people (and many straight people) have had formative sexual experiences with much older people. But regardless of any fond memories, sex between adults and adolescents is exploitation, not love, and I fail to see how graphic portrayals of sexual abuse contribute to tolerance and school safety.

The passages from the GLSEN-recommended books give unfortunate credence to the sexually obsessed, debaucherous caricatures that often dominate mainstream depictions of gays.  Incidentally, these are the very same caricatures that prevent broader support for gay marriage and adoption.  But being gay doesn’t mean you’re sentenced to a lifetime of loveless rest stop sex with strangers.  It doesn’t mean you can’t have a lifelong partner, intimacy, a family, and even a white picket fence. In my experience, too many gay kids don’t realize that, and these books certainly aren’t helping.

But GLSEN is not an organization dedicated to helping gay youth navigate the uncomfortable transition from adolescence to adulthood. It is just another manifestation of the “Youth Liberation” movement wherein children are being taught that they should be sexually available to adults, if for no other reason than to be comradely. That GLSEN’s real goal is simply the production of self-loathing sexual compulsives could not be more clear and their agenda of radically undermining morality is detrimental to gay and straight children, both of whom need to learn self-respect and sexual integrity as well as how to avoid getting STDs which is something GLSEN also fails at:

It should be noted that you can indeed catch many sexually transmitted diseases through having someone ejaculate in your mouth. The GLSEN presenter above accepts as a given that the 14-year-olds in the audience are having unprotected oral sex and never bothers to explain that most sexually transmitted diseases can be spread through unprotected oral sex. If they cared about gay youth, why didn’t they care to protect them from disease?

Gay youth, and all children, deserve better than the 70s style radical hedonism and exploitation that GLSEN is promoting. Their embrace of “Youth Liberation” style ideology, where children are treated as little adults who should be legal prey for child molesters and other degenerates, does not help gay youth prepare for a bright future, but instead is designed, knowingly or not, to feed the Dan Tsangs and David Thorstads of the world with a neverending supply of children who think being gay means casting aside their dignity while being used as living sex dolls for emotionally and psychologically stunted sub-humans who have conned the left into thinking they are something more than garden variety perverts.

It is time we demand that GLSEN stop supporting the exploitation of children and start living up to their mission of promoting an environment where every child is valued and respected. Promoting the idea that children secretly enjoy their abuse, that promiscuity is an innate characteristic of homosexuals, and that paraphilias are healthy, normal parts of sexuality does not promote the value and respect of any individual.