The Gray Lady’s twilight years is becoming more and more a symbol for the obsolescence of Mainstream Media dinosaurs in the face of the changing information landscape. From Editor and Publisher:

NEW YORK Quietly, without promoting the move, The New York Times began this week publishing on its Web site readers’ comments at the end of certain articles. This is a move The Washington Post and USA Today, and many other newspapers, began long ago.

However, most papers do not “moderate” comments unless a reader flags them. The Times, however, has created a new “comment desk,” with the hiring of four part-time staffers, “to screen all reader submissions before posting them, an investment unheard of in today’s depressed newspaper business environment,” Public Editor Clark Hoyt reveals today. “The Times has always allowed reader comments on the many blogs it publishes, with those responses screened by the newsroom staff.”

Martin Nisenholtz, senior vice president for digital operations of The New York Times Company, informs Hoyt, “A pure free-for-all doesn’t, in my opinion, equal good. It can equal bad.”

But Hoyt adds that the experience so far with moderated blogs “suggests what the paper is letting itself in for.” He then details some of the unsavory blog postings that have gotten past editors, quoting from racist comments on Mexicans in California and backing a hit on Rudy Giuliani.

“As The New York Times transforms itself into a multimedia news and information platform — the printed newspaper plus a robust nytimes.com offering breaking news, blogs, interactive graphics, video and more — it is struggling with a vexing problem,.” he observes. “How does the august Times, which has long stood for dignified authority, come to terms with the fractious, democratic culture of the Internet, where readers expect to participate but sometimes do so in coarse, bullying and misinformed ways?

“The answer so far is cautiously, carefully and with uneven success.”

Kate Phillips, editor of The Caucus blog, tells Hoyt she struggles sometimes with the “intolerance” and “vitriol” she sees in some comments — so much so that on rare occasions “I almost wish we could go back to the days when we never heard their voices.” She sometimes jumps in to warn readers about remaining civil.

Today the paper has a comments section on its top story on the new turmoil in Pakistan, with 101 of them appearing quickly. “Wow! This has all the emarks of the Shah of Iran. A US backed oppressive regime,” writes “Mike, Minn.”

Despite attempting to make it sound like a problem of a bi-partisan nature, even this piece can’t white wash the real concern among elitists in the Newspaper industry about a) having to address the masses as equals and b) giving the left yet another venue to expose it’s resurgent anti-semitism, childish political stances and its general uncivilized character.

The Times can hire a hundred comment editors and it won’t matter, within a year some lefty will have let an anti-semitic rant slip through and the conservative feeding frenzy will be the last nail in the NYT coffin. The sad part is that they’ll never see it coming.
h/t Hot Air.