This is How the Left Celebrates 9/11

I think this is a picture by ZombieTime but I’m not 100% sure. Anyway I just saw several of my old academic associates (who I keep tabs on via social networks, avoiding having to actually keep in touch) posting sentiments more subtle, but essentially the same. I was friends with a lot of liberals. Here’s how they think:

this-is-how-the-left-celebrates-9-11.jpg

Needless to say I rarely speak with many of my former friends.

Why I’ll Never Forget 9/11

never-forget-911.jpg

I’ve never delved deeply into my 9/11 memories on this blog or anywhere else but since there seems to be a movement to “put 9/11 behind us” among some on the left I wanted to put forward why I can’t, and I won’t.

I was in grad school on 9/11, Wesleyan University in Middletown CT. I had moved to Connecticut to make a change in my life and dry out. I lived in a small apartment at the time that stank like oily Chinese food until I had spent most of my free time there smoking Djarums and watching an old tv without cable. I worked a couple of lousy jobs until I started a job at the Middlesex County Y.M.C.A. in their before and after school program where busy parents could drop their kids off two hours before school began and three hours afterward. And yes there were parents who left there kids there all five hours.

I usually slept between shifts unless I had a class. I usually scheduled classes at night because I was used to being up late, but once I decided to stop drinking I didn’t have much to do. I didn’t have many friends either, because the first time you tell your old drinking buddies you’re on the wagon is usually the last time you see them. So I sat up most nights and smoked, sometimes I walked around a little but often enough I just sit in my living room, me and two cats and a pack of clove cigarettes.

The night before the attacks I had smoked more than usual and I was out of cigarettes so instead of going home and catching a nap after my first shift I hit a local smoke shop and strolled home. I remember it was a nice day and everyone seemed happy. I had even gotten off work early, usually we could get the kids to their teachers by 8:30 or so but I think that day it was much earlier. So I went home with my pack of cigarettes and decided to watch the news while drinking a an iced coffee I got from the Dunkin’ Donuts next door to me.

When I turned on the television the first tower was already burning. My mother went through the Trade Center everyday and her office was on Church street so I was worried. As I watched and the story unfolded I got a sickening feeling this was no accident as the local news had reported. I was about to call my mother when I saw the second plane hit on live television.

I remember yelling “No!” to the screen, I remember being shocked but mostly I remember feeling helpless. By that time phones were already useless, I couldn’t get through to my mother, I couldn’t get through to my wife who was working at a college just outside of New York City and the only information I was getting was from the news. At some point I knew this was a war although at that point I remember thinking it was the Russians because they had used commercial aircraft to invade Afghanistan.

I especially remember there was a Cuban guy who worked some sort of food cart outside the towers who was interviewed and he kept going back into the burning towers to help people just before the collapse and I thought about the fact that, given how much time I spent there before I moved, I probably bought food from him. And now he was dead.

In that little Connecticut college town I watched the news show examples of heroism as the people in New York pulled together to try to save their fellow citizens, and I watched as reports of other planes crashing horrified the nation. I kept trying to reach my wife and my mother and I couldn’t. I was panicked and upset and was desperately trying to figure out a way to get to New York when the phone finally rang. It wasn’t my mother or my wife it was my boss. They needed me at work early because the teachers were leaving.

The same elementary school teachers who had spent a good deal of their time telling kids who weren’t old enough to vote that Bush didn’t care about them (I saw the campaign posters they had kids draw in support of Gore) had fled like rats because they were scared terrorists would target a tiny college town no one’s ever heard of. I have never been as disgusted as I was in the moment Matt, my boss, told me he needed people to come in to staff the program because the school was closing. The school was closing but the kids were still there.

Matt was a good guy though. He asked if I was O.K., he told me I could use the program’s line to call my family if I needed to. So I went in to work and spent much of the rest of 9/11 with some worried kids who we entertained with card games while I discreetly slipped off to call my wife and my mother. My mother at the time was one of those people covered in ash walking across the Brooklyn bridge while my wife was comforting the kids in her department who had loved ones working downtown. Not every teacher abandoned their post, but enough did.

It was the next day before I learned I still had a living mother and my wife was safe. That same day a little boy in the program, about 10-years-old, came up to me in the morning and asked if I saw the Trade Centers collapse. He then grinned and started talking about how cool it was. The site supervisor whisked him away before I could respond, though I frankly don’t blame a child for what the parents allow. His parents never apologized.

Those next few days I started hearing, on my campus, the first rumblings of how we were at fault, how we shouldn’t respond with violence, how the whole thing was a tragedy we could have avoided. I heard nothing of the heroism of the many who died or the cowardice of those in our midsts who abandoned children to hide in their living rooms while child care workers, many of whom were teens themselves, came to the rescue of the school system. And I especially didn’t hear about the unmitigated evil of those who planned and executed the attacks.

I already heard people saying we should put this behind us.

The thing about 9/11 I will never forget is that at time when I was changing my views on a lot of things, like drugs and drinking and the various givens of the Libertarian lifestyle I wanted until then to lead, I saw a little snippet of truth. I saw that there really are two kinds of people in this world. There are the people who are selling hot dogs from a cart one minute and the very next they are ready to sacrifice their lives to save others from a burning inferno, and then there are people who leave children in a building alone, afraid and confused when they get the slightest hint of danger. There are people who pray for the victims of 9/11 and there are those who desecrate their memory by implying they deserved to die.

There are people like myself who tear up when they think of that day, and there are people who make jokes about 9/11 and those who did their best on that day to minimize the loss of life.

I hear people say that 9/11 changed them but I think instead of changing me 9/11 taught me something. It showed me who people really are and who I wanted to be. Most of all it showed me who I didn’t want to be, another out of touch professor who couldn’t bring themselves to applaud the heroes of 9/11.

Most of our “elites” hate the country and the rest of the people in it. They think 9/11 is a joke, they think patriotism is wrong and they think the rest of us, no matter how educated, don’t matter. That’s the key to understanding the teachers who left the elementary schools that day and to the Wonkette staff who think 9/11 is an example of American over sentimentality. To them the people who died, the people who served admirably and the people who were moved by 9/11 just don’t matter.

Neither does America, neither does our troops or even the ideals of freedom and liberty for all. What matters to them is them. What matters is their comfort and their ability live in an untouched cocoon of ideological purity where all voices say the same thing and no man need the courage of their convictions. What matters to them is the world not seeing how weak, craven and repugnant they are.

It was tough returning to Wesleyan to finish my Masters, not because of the work or bad memories, but because I know what kind of people I meet on university campuses. I know they’d leave me in a fire if I was unconscious, I know they’d stand back and watch me be murdered and afterward they’d tell people I probably had it coming. I know that no matter how much they claim to be interested in the welfare of others that for most their true face is that of a coward who will never be there for you when the chips are down. Just being near people like that makes me sick.

That’s why, despite the exhortations of the left, I cannot “put 9/11 behind me” or move on. I see it in their eyes and their faces, the cravenness, the spite and the nihilism. 9/11 exposes people like that for what they are, which is why they are so ready to have it forgotten. But the lesson of 9/11 is not one that can easily be erased. There are heroes in this world and their are cowards, and you can tell which by what whether or not they honor the victims of 9/11.

Update: “Zuzu” at Shakesville proves my point. She and the commenters on her post are “sick” of 9/11 and callously asks for people to be more callous about the date, lest she personally be put upon by reflecting on tragedy. Typical of the White Liberal Elite to demand the rest of us play into whatever fantasy they make up about their common and uninteresting lives.  May the gods forbid that Police and Firefighters  want the country to remember their brothers and sisters who sacrificed  themselves to save others,  or that the victims family receive the sympathy and love of the nation.  Zuzu needs 365 days a year to prove she’s smarter than the rest of us and oddly the perennial victim of a patriarchal system she’s not able to outwit.

Sorry “Zuzu” the country didn’t mean to bother you.

Update: Sorry for the confusion. This was originally published last year, but I re-published it for today.

Washington Post Guest Blogger Wayne Logan Says Jaycee Dugard Case Proves Sex Offender Registries Don’t Work

Even though sans registry Dugard would have never been rescued. I guess that little tidbit slipped past guest blogger and “expert” Wayne Logan (author of a sex offender martyrdom fantasy disguised as a textbook called Knowledge as Power) in this Washington Post piece in which he basically repeats the arguments that “sex offender activists” make about how unfair and ineffective it is to have sex offender registries. You know, because it somehow makes children less safe to have known degenerates listed on a database people can check before they hire or date them:

The alleged kidnapping, sexual assault and 18-year imprisonment of Jaycee Dugard highlights the need to reassess the nation’s sex offender registration and community notification laws.

Suspect Phillip Garrido was on California’s registry, which like other state registries is known to be rife with inaccuracies and missing data. Garrido, however, was not among the scofflaws. He dutifully kept authorities apprised of his whereabouts, and his identifying information (including home address) was prominently posted on the Internet due to California’s concern about the significant offenses in his history.

Perversely, Garrido was thus a “success.”

But his sustained depravity highlights a reality long known to police: Individuals determined to commit repeated sexual crimes will find a way to do so. Garrido not only was compliant when his crimes came to light in 2009 but also was on California’s registry when he abducted Dugard in 1991.

No, actually Garrido was a failure. He was a failure of a system that never took a dangerous predator seriously. Law enforcement failed to investigate him aggressively and ignored the woman who married and aided him in his crimes, his parole officers failed to keep up with him or his co-conspirator wife and his neighbors all were happy to turn a blind eye to obvious and overt degeneracy. Garrido was a failure of society not the registry.

But let’s say none of that was true and Garrido still got away with his crimes, until of course he was caught due to the great police work of Allison Jacobs, who used her head, the registry and some good old fashioned common sense. Let’s say Garrido slipped through the cracks. How does that prove the registry is useless? Does the fact that some murders go unsolved mean prison sentences don’t work? Does the fact that felons get handguns mean we shouldn’t have laws prohibiting felons from buying guns? This is what Logan is basically saying, that one case of a program not being 100% effective means that program is totally ineffective.

And the program here failed due to human error (or negligence really) a point Logan himself is aware of but considers unimportant:

A reassessment of the laws will need to surmount at least two major obstacles. First, any effort will be distracted by the knowledge that human error played a role in this case — police repeatedly failed to aggressively investigate Garrido. If registries are to exist, individuals such as Garrido surely should be on them. Yet, we know that registries contain far more individuals than can realistically be monitored, including many low-risk convicts.

This problem calls to mind Justice Potter Stewart’s comment that “[w]hen everything is classified then nothing is classified, and the system becomes one to be disregarded by the cynical or the careless.” There will always be a risk of police errors, but the nation’s over-inclusive system significantly heightens this possibility.

In other words monitoring the registry is too hard so let’s quit. It would seem to me an author and professor would be embarrassed to use the same logic we scold children for using. It’s hard to stop gangs from taking over inner city neighborhoods, should we stop trying? It’s hard to get addicts off meth, does that mean we should simply legalize meth or should we be re-doubling our efforts to educate people about the dangers of meth use? That effort would be helped by showing teens meth users during their health classes, because there would be less people trying meth if they knew beforehand what tweakers eventually look and live like.

Likewise the registry is as educational as it is functional. Despite what people like Logan would have you believe, the registry isn’t full of people who were caught peeing in the bushes of a park. Anyone who has looked one up can tell you they are full of rapists, child exploiters and criminal sexual deviants. This exercise, in and of itself, is educational for many people who buy into Logan’s brand of hug-a-thuggery. Logan seems to think that the registry is full of too many types of offenders, but this simply isn’t true. Most of the offenders are people who A) shouldn’t work with children and B) should be on a list people who need to know can check (single mothers or non-profits, for example) and the idea that we “can’t monitor them all” doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to monitor any them. If anything the Dugard case proves we should be more proactive in monitoring sexual predators.

Then Logan simply starts repeating the SOSEN talking points about how awful we law and order types are for making these poor rapists and child molesters suffer:

Second, any effort at reevaluation will likely face political resistance. Politicians raising the possibility of a reevaluation risk being branded as soft on crime or — worse — regarded as disrespectful of victims after whom laws are often named. Moreover, one often hears that the laws are justified “if one child is saved.”

Lessening penalties for people who rape infants, bury children they raped alive and trade in child porn is being soft on crime, and indeed disrespectful of not only well known victims but all victims. Here Logan is truly exposed. He doesn’t believe there is such a thing as being too soft on crime, that’s just nonsense we right-wing knuckle draggers say to politicians when they aren’t torturing some poor helpless rapist. And certainly the idea that one child’s life could be weighed against the inconvenience of being put on a list of people not allowed work with children or the possibility that the single mother some pervert is trying to date acts responsibly and checks out her boyfriend before allowing him to babysit is the very definition of fascism!  Logan acts as if the registry grabs random people of its own volition. Every person on the registry committed a crime that violated another person.

To Logan that’s irrelevant. He goes on:

But the nationwide social experiment of registration and community notification laws, affecting hundreds of thousands of individuals and their families, imposes significant costs. It also distracts from other — possibly preferable — public safety strategies. The system demands a closer look. Indeed, it would be difficult to identify any other social policy of such magnitude that has evaded a critical review.

“Other preferable public safety strategies” like not forcing sex offenders to take responsibility for their crimes? Not empowering communities to ensure the safety of their children? I worked in after-school and teen programs and public registries of sex offenders are a god send. When I hired a staff for a summer camp in Brooklyn we required all applicants to pass a background check where their fingerprints were to be taken to the police and their prints and name checked against all manner of criminal databases. A significant portion of those applying never got that done and never came back. Many of those people were likely dangerous to children. The system works there, but it cost a pretty penny to implement. So what if there is a program in a state which doesn’t support background checks? What if I wanted to check out a volunteer at a church program or teen center before leaving that person alone with children?

He goes on to sound very much like Tom Madison or “Zman” wrapping up his essay with rousing leftist articles of faith such as it’s unlikely for a child to be victimized by a stranger … as Jaycee Dugard was. I hear this repeated so often I suspect it’s taught in some sociology textbook. It’s a tidbit that’s meaningful to the academic trying to prove a point, but probably not to the mothers of the hundreds of thousands of missing children who have experienced this “rare” stranger abduction. It certainly is a finer point lost on Jaycee Dugard. Or Jessica Lundsford. Or the 12-year-old girl who was molested by a stranger in Chicago who walked up to her out of the blue and made her touch his genitals. Or the six-year-old boy grabbed and French kissed by a stranger in California. But that’s the real world, not the university quad or a faculty meeting, so Logan will never have even heard of such things.

Police and communities having the ability to know what kind of people live in an area is a good thing, and sex offender registries, public or not, are part of that. But Logan and his ilk aren’t interested in that. They are interested in boilerplate platitudes that mesh well with liberal sensibilities and the intellectualizing of degeneracy, sadism and ultimately evil. Logan is one of a thousand academics in their ivory towers who throw out dubious statistics always meant to mitigate people’s depravity. They write their books and articles with the cold detached eye of the sheltered and the privileged, always ready to deconstruct the next rape and murder until the savages become the victims and the victims are forgotten. The supreme irony of all academics that study criminals is that they see them ultimately as the real victims, and work to promote that idea no matter what the cost.

But they rarely even mention the real victims. Sympathy for them isn’t a narrative that gets you a cushy job at a liberal arts college which is much more important than some child they don’t even know.

ACORN Caught Promoting Child Sexual Slavery!

Breitbart’s new blog Big Government has started of with a bang. ACORN workers help a filmmaker posing as a pimp and an actress posing as a hooker fraudulently fill out mortgage and tax forms to set up a brothel. The workers also tell the couple to claim the underage human trafficking victims they were going to house at their brothel as dependents, and one woman tells the “prostitute” to teach the children forced into sexual slavery to “keep their mouths shut.”

I was going to write a long essay about morality, but watch the video and you’ll know what I was going to say anyway. These people are animals:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtTnizEnC1U[/youtube]

Part II

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYU9PamIZk[/youtube]

What kind of people don’t even blink when you tell them you’re bringing girls as young as 13 into the country and forcing them to turn tricks? What kind of people don’t call the police? A degenerate. When will we start an investigation on these scum?