San Francisco Condemns Catholic Teachings on Homosexuality, Islamic Homophobia Deemed Acceptable

muslims-hanging-gays.jpg

Morons in San Francisco put together an official resolution condemning Catholic teachings on homosexuality a couple of years ago. The Church has wasted those last two years fighting a non-binding, non-regulatory proclamation in court instead of telling the city of San Fransisco to get bent, shutting down its churches and letting the anti-Catholic rabble of that hell hole feed their own homeless and shelter the illegals on the run from the law in their living rooms.

From (sigh) WND:

A San Francisco city and county board resolution that officially labeled the Catholic church’s moral teachings on homosexuality as “insulting to all San Franciscans,” “hateful,” “defamatory,” “insensitive” and “ignorant” will be challenged tomorrow in court for violating the Constitution’s prohibition of government hostility toward religion.

Resolution 168-08, passed unanimously by the City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors two years ago, also accused the Vatican of being a “foreign country” meddling with and attempting to “negatively influence (San Francisco’s) existing and established customs.”

It said of the church’s teaching on homosexuality, “Such hateful and discriminatory rhetoric is both insulting and callous, and shows a level of insensitivity and ignorance which has seldom been encountered by this Board of Supervisors.”

As WND reported, Resolution 168-08 was an official response to the Catholic Church’s ban on adoption placements into homosexual couple households, issued by Cardinal William Levada of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith at the Vatican.

The board’s resolution urged the city’s local archbishop and the Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of San Francisco to defy the Vatican’s instructions, concluding with a spiteful reminder that the church authority that issued the ban was known 100 years ago as “The Holy Office of the Inquisition.”

The resolution also took a shot at Levada, the former archbishop of San Francisco, saying, “Cardinal Levada is a decidedly unqualified representative of his former home city, and of the people of San Francisco and the values they hold dear.”

The anti-Catholic diatribe had been challenged in U.S. District Court on similar grounds, but District Judge Marilyn Hall Patel ruled in favor of the city, saying, in essence, the church started it.

Right. Anyway lost on the Church and the people in San Fransisco is that in the two years since their proclamation there’s another homophobic religion who, unlike the all-talk Catholics, actually follow through on their no gay stuff ban. Despite the fact that homosexuals are killed in Muslim countries every year for the “crime” of being gay, the San Fransisco politicians have felt no need to condemn Islam.

I wonder why?

muslims-violent-animals.jpg

England Gun Ban Update

Some on the right have been celebrating the recent “restoration” of the right of self-defense to our down trodden brethren in England. Without the proper means to defend themselves, this is little more than the police there telling people to make a last stand.

This N.R.A. video should put things in perspective, including why the new ruling is so important. But “allowing” unarmed citizens to confront the stab happy drug crazed “youths” rampaging through their country is basically the government’s way of telling the English it’s pretty much over for their country and as I’ve said before, they can’t control their streets.

[youtube]qGVAQOUi6ec[/youtube]

Animal Killing Envirocult Claims Advances in C.P.R. Not a Good Enough Reason to Experiment on Pigs

The research PETA is complaining about has been credited with saving 200 live in Arizona alone. PETA, an organization that kills 90% of the animals it shelters, says that’s not good enough to excuse experimenting on 60-80 pigs a year. From the AZ Star:

Dr. Gordon Ewy is used to the praise and publicity that come with radically improving CPR techniques, saving hundreds, if not thousands, of lives.

But to make those breakthroughs, Ewy has had to experiment on pigs, which has made PETA hog-wild.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals has named Ewy, the longtime head of the University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, as one of its “vivisector of the month” finalists.

The organization argues that Ewy could have done his experiments on people rather than on pigs.

Members of the animal-protection group say his breakthrough of compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which the American Heart Association has endorsed as the CPR method of choice, is dubious.

“We take a look at the relevance and the importance of the study. Are there other methods for studying what he is studying?” said Kathy Guillermo, PETA’s laboratory investigations director, describing how the organization chooses finalists. “How valuable is this to human beings in the first place?”

Ewy’s compression-only CPR, shown to be superior to long-standard mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, is now used by paramedics across the country. A recent study found that in Arizona alone, it has saved more than 200 lives.

“Cardiac arrest is a huge public health problem in the United States,” Ewy said. “I suppose it would be very nice if we didn’t have to do experiments or research on animals, but practically all the advances in any medicine were tried out with animals first.”

The Sarver Heart Center has always disclosed that it does research on pigs, whose hearts are similar to human hearts in size, blood flow and design.

So PETA’s stance is that they can have their barbaric thugs kill animals people trust them to save, including kittens, but a doctor studying ways to help people with heart attacks is evil.

Does anyone beside moronic celebrities still think this cult of kooks has any credibility?