Leftist nonsense in its purest form. Car wrecks are of course deadlier than me throwing a bag of McDonalds out my car window, but the narrative of the left is designed to give them the totalitarian power, including the power to treat littering as worse than murder, so we get tortured logic and the minimizing of the pain and suffering of car crash victims.

From Reuters (where else):

LONDON (Reuters) – Air pollution has cut the average life expectancy of Europeans by nearly a year and contributes to the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of people annually, the European Environment Agency said on Wednesday.

More than 100 million people in the region encompassing 53 countries also lack access to safe drinking water, a problem most acute in rural areas, the group which compiles data for the European Union said in a report.

Levels of air pollution reduce life expectancy by as much as two years in the most affected areas of Belgium, the Netherlands, northern Italy and parts of Poland and Hungary, the report said.

“Poor air quality is still causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths in Europe every year and continues to damage crops and ecosystem health,” the report said.

“The estimated annual loss of life is significantly greater than that due to car accidents.”

Some 870 million people live in the region, more than half in western and central Europe, the report said.

Air pollution cuts a whole two years off people’s lives in some undisclosed way we should just take their word for. Odd. No mention of increased cancer rates in the article, no mention of asthma, just an assertion that two years are cut off everyone’s life by pollution.

I wonder what the report really says. Because I’m thinking it doesn’t say being torn asunder in a high speed auto wreck is better than 89 year olds not making it to 91. But maybe it does, those wacky Europeans see things a bit differently than the rest of us.

Before I get any complaints, the above still is from a movie called Zombie Hunter. We don’t do snuff here.

Now they’re just pulling our legs, right?

MORE kangaroos should be slaughtered and eaten to help save the world from global warming, environmental activists say.
The controversial call to cut down on beef and serve more of the national symbol on our dinner plates follows a report on curbing greenhouse gas emissions damaging the planet.

Greenpeace energy campaigner Mark Wakeham urged Aussies to substitute some red meat for roo to help reduce land clearing and the release of methane gas.

“It is one of the lifestyle changes we can make,” Mr Wakeham said.

“Changing our meat consumption habits is a small way to make an impact.”

The eat roo recommendation is contained in a report, Paths to a Low-Carbon Future, commissioned by Greenpeace and released today.

It also coincides with recent calls from climate change experts for people in rich countries to reduce red meat and switch to chicken and fish because land-clearing and burping and farting cattle and sheep were damaging the environment.

They said nearly a quarter of the planet’s greenhouse gases came from agriculture, which releases the potent heat-trapping gas methane.

Roughly three million kangaroos are killed and harvested for meat each year. They are shot with high-powered guns between the eyes at night.

Australians eat about a third of the 30 million kilograms of roo meat produced annually. The delicacy is exported to dozens of countries and is most popular in Germany, France and Belgium.

The Greenpeace report has renewed calls for Victoria to lift a ban on harvesting roos for food.

Kangaroo Industry Association of Australia spokesman John Kelly said roos invading farmers’ crops were already being illegally shot.

“They are being culled and left to rot,” Mr Kelly said.

Kangaroo meat sold in Victoria is imported from interstate.

Australia’s kangaroo population has halved to 25 million in the past five years as the drought has taken a toll on breeding and the animals’ food sources, Mr Kelly said.

Under a quota system, 10 to 12 per cent can be killed for the meat and leather industry. Aerial surveys estimate their numbers.

Today’s report by leading scientist Dr Mark Diesendorf, from the University of NSW, says greenhouse gas emissions need to be slashed by at least a third by 2020 to avoid a climate change catastrophe.

His recommendations include:

REDUCING beef consumption and increasing kangaroo meat production.

CUTTING gas and coal production.

HALTING land clearing and deforestation.

SHIFTING to renewable energy such as wind power and bioelectricity from crop residues.

“The world is currently on track to experience runaway global warming with average temperatures soon to exceed 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, Dr Diesendorf said.

So the mighty environmentalist is planning to kill more Kangaroos even though their numbers are already being decimated by drought? Because temps will average 97 in the summer instead of 95?

Ignore that many of his recommendations, like switching to wind and “bioelectricity” will leave Australians in a pre-industrial hellhole, reverting a first world country into a third world one in one fell swoop, but if Kangaroos are already being hard pressed by drought, isn’t it irresponsible to advocate harvesting more of them?

And I say this as a man who has eaten Kangaroo before. I’m no ‘roo lover, but this is just awful.